netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] siw: Add support for CRC32C offload instruction using libcrypto crc32c-intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:06:11 -0600
From:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bernard Metzler <BMT@...ich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] siw: Add support for CRC32C offload instruction
	using libcrypto crc32c-intel

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:38:31PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:

> So I think the main bit here is the ability to request
> crc32c-intel.ko first, and then fall back to crc32c.ko when the
> former is not available on CONFIG_X86.

Well, it is what Andi said, everything is working fine but there is no
mechanism to autoload the accelerated crypto module. If you did
modprobe crc32c_intel prior to loading your driver it would
automatically get crc32c-intel when it asks for crc32c since it is
loaded and a higher priority.

So, the drivers are correct to just request crc32c .. The work around
to limited autoprobing is so trivial (modprob crc32_intel) I'm not
sure including extra autoprobing code in the drivers is worthwhile?

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html