netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: fix a lockdep splat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:05:00 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	jarkao2@...il.com, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix a lockdep splat

Le mercredi 22 septembre 2010 à 21:23 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:43:39 +0200
> > 
> >> (A) (this is used in net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c)
> >> read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock) (without blocking BH)
> >> <BH>
> >> spin_lock(&sk->sk_slock.slock);
> >> ...
> >> read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> >> ...
> > 
> > What's the exact path that leads to this?  I looked quickly and couldn't
> > find which sunrpc callback override does it.
> 
> Sorry, I'm being unusually dense at the moment, ignore this question :-)

No problem ;)

But we might answer it anyway for other readers :

vi +1417 net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c

static void xs_udp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
{
        read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);

// We can be interrupted here and call INPUT_PATH()

        /* from net/core/sock.c:sock_def_write_space */
        if (sock_writeable(sk))
                xs_write_space(sk);

        read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
}

INPUT_PATH()
{
	spin_lock(&sk->slock);
	queue skb to receive queue or backlog
	spin_unlock(&sk->slock);
}


If another cpu does (C), we can deadlock.

C)
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_slock)
...
write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
...

Then we can have a deadlock with (A)

CPU1 [A]                                CPU2 [C]
read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
<BH>                                    spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_slock)
<wait to spin_lock(slock)>
                                        <wait to write_lock_bh(callback_lock)>


It seems only TCP stack contains [C] cases, in very unlikely paths, but still...

Since all AF_INET sockets share the same af_callback_key 
*and* the same af_family_slock_keys, lockdep warned Tetsuo because
 it detects an UDP [A] case and a TCP [C] case.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html