netdev - Re: checkentry function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 05 Oct 2010 08:23:58 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Nicola Padovano <nicola.padovano@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: checkentry function

Le mardi 05 octobre 2010 à 08:11 +0200, Nicola Padovano a écrit :
> >
> > Negative (ie < 0) is used for error numbers. This is confusing
> > because in older kernels the checkentry returned a bool which
> > is defined as 1 okay and 0 for error.
> >
> ok i see.
> 
> and why i have this output?
> DEBUG: the tablename (not FILTER) is: �%H �
> 
> I want block my target if the table name is NOT filter...so i write:
> 
> [CODE]
> ...
>  if (strcmp(tablename, "filter"))   {
>    printk(KERN_INFO "DEBUG: the tablename (not FILTER) is %s\n",tablename);
>    return ERROR_VALUE; // < 0
>  }
> [/CODE]
> 
> but in the tablename variable i haven't the table's right value (but i
> have: �%H � a wrong value)...what's the problem?
> 
> 

Because xxx_check() signature is not the one you use.

Could you read source code of _current_ existing modules , and use
copy/paste ?

static int hashlimit_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
{
...
}



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html