netdev - Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH v3] Topcliff: Update PCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:12:52 +0200
From:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	masa-korg@....okisemi.com, andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, margie.foster@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, yong.y.wang@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
	mkl@...gutronix.de, chripell@...e.org, morinaga526@....okisemi.com,
	meego-dev@...go.com, kok.howg.ewe@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
	qi.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH v3] Topcliff: Update PCH_CAN driver to 2.6.35

On 10/06/2010 05:09 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>
> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:07:15 +0900
> 
>> Does your mail mean, for accepting upstream, NAPI is essential for
>> CAN driver ?
> 
> It is up to the CAN maintainers :-)

Well, our SJA1000 reference driver does still not use NAPI. But NAPI is
for CAN especially useful to avoid the infamous *bus error irq
flooding*, which may hang low end systems if the interrupts are handled
in the IRQ context. Ohtake, if your system can handle well such CAN bus
error irq storms at 1MB/s, then NAPI is *not* a must to have. Anyway, as
you are at it, I also suggest to use NAPI right from the beginning.

Wolfgang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html