netdev - Re: netlink versus pid namespaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:23:11 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	xemul@...nvz.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: netlink versus pid namespaces

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 07:19:03PM +0400, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> > netlink uses pids (or really tids I hope?) to address sockets
> > associated with processes.
> 
> Not really. It uses port number which is called "pid" occasionally. Bad name.
> Autobind function simply selects tgid of calling process as the first guess.

Thanks for the clarification, Alexey. I guess I should have read more
code :/

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html