netdev - RE: [PATCH v2 11/14] bnx2x: Update bnx2x to use new vlan accleration.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 24 Oct 2010 02:21:53 -0700
From:	"Vladislav Zolotarov" <vladz@...adcom.com>
To:	"Jesse Gross" <jesse@...ira.com>
cc:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Hao Zheng" <hzheng@...ira.com>,
	"Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 11/14] bnx2x: Update bnx2x to use new vlan
 accleration.

> >
> > We hit the same BUG() both when VLAN stripping is disabled.
> 
> This one surprises me because that function shouldn't get called at
> all when VLAN stripping is disabled.  Are you sure that it is
> disabled?  From my reading of the bnx2x driver it seems like it is
> always enabled.

I tried to check all possibilities and to check at which level the problem is,
so I patched the bnx2x not to do the stripping and recompiled it with the
kernel having CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q disabled. Then I saw the (same) BUG() message
again. It seems to me that your patch series were meant to remove the 
handling of this configuration (CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q) from the L2 drivers 
as well, isn't it? This means that the same VLAN flows, both accelerated and none
accelerated should be "active" both when this configuration is present and 
when it's not... Do I get it right?

Thanks,
vlad

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html