netdev - Re: [Security] TIPC security issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:00:23 -0400
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, drosenberg@...curity.com,
	jon.maloy@...csson.com, allan.stephens@...driver.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Security] TIPC security issues

On 10-10-27 02:35 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:27:13 -0400
> 
>> I've got some patches from Al that I'm pre-reviewing/testing
>> before spamming everyone with them (will send within 24h, if
>> that is OK).   Anyway, in the above, does it make sense to
>> check for the overflow incrementally, i.e. something like this?
> 
> Can you please not work on this in private?  That's the only reason
> we have duplicated work here.

Sorry -- my intent was to not waste people's time with stuff
that might have obvious issues.  I'll send what I have now
and we can go from there.

P.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html