netdev - Re: [PATCH 05/15] dec netdev: relocate DIGITAL based drivers to legacy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	macro@...ux-mips.org
Cc:	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] dec netdev: relocate DIGITAL based drivers to
 legacy

From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 05:21:35 +0100 (BST)

> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> 
>> DEC as a name brand has been gone for over 10 years, and these
>> drivers represent technology from the 1990's like the venerable
>> ISA bus.  Hence relocate them to the legacy dir.
> 
>  NAK for the TURBOchannel bits (defxx.[ch] and declance.c) unless you give 
> a plausible justification.  You won't get these drivers offered unless you 
> have the bus in your system anyway, and if you do than you don't want to 
> have them hidden somewhere in the corner.  If you see anything wrong with 
> these drivers, then please do let me know.
> 
>  Also defxx.c is PCI too (apart from being EISA and TC).

PCI things can be legacy too.

This is not about a specific bus technology, it's simply for
"really old stuff" so we can declutter the top-level of drivers/net

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html