netdev - Re: [PATCH] atomic: add atomic_inc_not_zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:12:51 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atomic: add atomic_inc_not_zero_hint()

Le vendredi 05 novembre 2010 à 11:40 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :

> OK, so I cannot resist the challenge...  ;-)
> 

I knew that ;)

> Suppose that the atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() is in common code that might
> be invoked from a cleanup path.  On the cleanup path, perhaps within an
> RCU callback, if the reference is zero, we have the only reference and
> thus don't need to increment the reference count.  On the other hand,
> if the reference is non-zero, we want to obtain a reference in order
> to safely attempt to encourage the other reference holder to let go
> more quickly.
> 
> Perhaps a bit of a stretch, but why not just replace the above
> "return 0" with "atomic_inc_not_zero(v)"?  It will usually be
> compiled out, right?

Yes indeed, thanks !



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html