netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] can: Topcliff: PCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:39:28 +0900
From:	"Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
To:	"Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@...ndegger.com>
Cc:	<andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>,
	"Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>,
	"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <margie.foster@...el.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de>, <yong.y.wang@...el.com>,
	"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>, <joel.clark@...el.com>,
	<kok.howg.ewe@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Christian Pellegrin" <chripell@...e.org>, <qi.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: Fix build warnings

On Friday, November 12, 2010 8:45 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:

> >> This is an enumeration:
> >>
> >> enum {
> >> PCH_STUF_ERR = 1,
> >> PCH_FORM_ERR,
> >> PCH_ACK_ERR,
> >> PCH_BIT1_ERR;
> >> PCH_BIT0_ERR,
> >> PCH_CRC_ERR,
> >> PCH_LEC_ALL;
> >> }
> > 
> > No, 
> > LEC is for bit assignment.
> > Thus, "enum" can't be used.
> 
> Why? For me it's a classical enum because the value matters, and *not*
> the individual bit. Do you agree?

Sorry, at last, I understand your saying.
I agree.



> >> Also, could you please add the TEC and REC:
> >>
> >> cf->data[6] = ioread32(&priv->regs->errc) & CAN_TEC;
> >> cf->data[7] = (ioread32(&priv->regs->errc) & CAN_REC) >> 8;
> > 
> > I will add.
> 
> BTW: it could be done with one I/O call:
> 
>   errc = ioread32(&priv->regs->errc);
>   cf->data[6] = errc & CAN_TEC;
>   cf->data[7] = (errc & CAN_REC) >> 8;
> 
> > But I couldn't find 
> 
> Don't understand? It's also implemented for the SJA1000 driver:

Sorry, the above my line is fogotten to delete.
I can uderstand your saying.

---
Thanks,

Tomoya MORINAGA
OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html