netdev - Re: [Q] How to invalidate ARP cache for a network device from within kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:33:42 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux1394-devel <linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Q] How to invalidate ARP cache for a network device from
 within kernel

On Nov 27 Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] firewire: net: restart ISO channel on bus resets
> 
> ---
>  drivers/firewire/net.c |    5 +++++
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firewire/net.c b/drivers/firewire/net.c
> index 1a467a9..007969c 100644
> --- a/drivers/firewire/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/firewire/net.c
> @@ -1593,10 +1593,15 @@ static void fwnet_update(struct fw_unit *unit)
>  {
>  	struct fw_device *device = fw_parent_device(unit);
>  	struct fwnet_peer *peer = dev_get_drvdata(&unit->device);
> +	struct fwnet_device *dev = peer->dev;
>  	int generation;
>  
>  	generation = device->generation;
>  
> +	fw_iso_context_stop(dev->broadcast_rcv_context);
> +	fw_iso_context_start(dev->broadcast_rcv_context, -1, 0,
> +			FW_ISO_CONTEXT_MATCH_ALL_TAGS);
> +
>  	spin_lock_irq(&peer->dev->lock);
>  	peer->node_id    = device->node_id;
>  	peer->generation = generation;

Could you add a changelog?

And it can be optimized to do only once per bus generation.  E.g. add a
generation field for the IR context in fwnet_device.  Or do it only if
fw_unit is that of the local node.

OTOH, is this actually necessary on normal bus resets?  It should only
be necessary after PM resume, right?  If so, perhaps do it only if the
generation increased by more than one.

Also, wouldn't a fw_iso_context_start alone, without prior stop,
suffice?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- =-== ==-==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html