netdev - Re: [Patch] bonding: clean up netpoll code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:26:47 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
	bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] bonding: clean up netpoll code

On 12/01/10 16:03, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 à 02:45 -0500, Amerigo Wang a écrit :
>> Against net-next-2.6.
>>
>> This patch unifies the netpoll code in bonding with netpoll code in bridge,
>> thanks to Herbert that code is much cleaner now.
>>
>> It also removes the flag IFF_IN_NETPOLL, we don't need it any more since
>> we have netpoll_tx_running() now.
>>
>> It passes my basic testings.
>
> Sorry this NETPOLL patch is frightening...
>
> Could you split it in several parts ?
>
> The removal of IFF_IN_NETPOLL deserves a patch on its own, its not a
> cleanup at all, if you ask me.
>

Is this necessary?
It is just replacing checking IFF_IN_NETPOLL with netpoll_tx_running(),
you might need to take a look at the bridge code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html