netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] ixgbe: fix link behavior for SFP+ when driver is brought down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:44:23 -0800
From:	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
	"bphilips@...ell.com" <bphilips@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] ixgbe: fix link behavior for SFP+ when
 driver is brought down

On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 09:42 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> Please number your patches so I know unambiguously in which order to
> apply them.
> 
> The last patch didn't apply cleanly because ixgbe_types.h in your
> tree has:
> 
> #define IXGBE_ERR_SFP_SETUP_NOT_COMPLETE        -30
> 
> but that does not exist in net-next-2.6  This doesn't exist in
> net-2.6 either so it's something completely local to your trees.
> 
> I fixed all of this up and applied it all, but this sort of stuff
> needs to be sorted out before I see the submission. :-)

I apologize, the missing define was in the patch

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/73942/

which I sent out earlier this week.  I was going to send you out a
summary email letting you know that the six patches I submitted were on
my tree. My fault that I did not.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)