netdev - Re: [PATCH] ehea: add the correct LRO status at dev->features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:57:26 -0200
From:	Breno Leitao <leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: add the correct LRO status at dev->features

On 12/06/2010 02:48 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon,  6 Dec 2010 14:39:42 -0200
> leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>
>> Currently ehea is not setting NETIF_F_LRO, and it is not providing
>> a callback for get_flags on ethtool. This patch fixes it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao<leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> More importantly, ehea does not support set_flags to disable LRO.
Correct, currently LRO is a module parameter. I have an item in my TODO 
list to implement set_flags, and thus, the LRO scheme.

So, if you prefer I can send this patch with the future set_flags ones. 
But, for now, this patch allows the user to check when LRO is enabled. 
As it is today, it shows that LRO is disabled all the time.

Anyway, you choose what is the best option.

Thanks,
Breno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html