netdev - Re: (Lack of) specification for RX n-tuple filtering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:10:53 +0200
From:	"Vladislav Zolotarov" <vladz@...adcom.com>
To:	"Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
cc:	"Dimitris Michailidis" <dm@...lsio.com>,
	"Peter Waskiewicz" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: (Lack of) specification for RX n-tuple filtering


> The implementation of the -U
> option could potentially be made to fallback to ETHTOOL_SRXCLSRLINS if
> vlan_tag and user_def are not specified.
> 

Having said that, don't u think that it could be more user friendly to
extend the ETHTOOL_SRXCLSRLINS interface to handle the lan_tag and
user_def and drop the n-tuple interface at all?

thanks,
vlad 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html