netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: increase skb->users instead of skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:43:47 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Junchang Wang <junchangwang@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Xinan Tang <xinan.tang@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: increase skb->users instead of skb_clone()

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, but you want to, because each receiver has to make a private copy
> of the skb.
>
> The big win is that if packet if filtered out (not accepted by the
> socket filter), you end with no extra skb_clone() at all.
>
> Say you have 8 receivers, with a filter matching some hash/cpu, and only
> one af_packet socket will take the message.
>
> Before patch : 8 skb_clones()
>
> After patch : one skb_clone()
>
> If I undertood patch intent ;)
>

Yes, you got it. :)

-- 
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html