netdev - Re: Possible regression: Packet drops during iptables calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:02:41 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Possible regression: Packet drops during iptables calls

Le jeudi 16 décembre 2010 à 15:29 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le jeudi 16 décembre 2010 à 15:24 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer a
> écrit :
> 
> > In my case I think this will not help. I'll kill the cache anyways, as
> > the ruleset is 19MB and my CPU cache is 8MB.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Yep ;)
> 
> By the way, you speak of a 'possible regression', but we always masked
> BH while doing get_counters().
> 
> Only very recent kernels are masking them for each unit (cpu) of work.
> 
> There was attempt to use a lockless read for each counter (using a
> seqlock), but it was not completed. I guess we could do something to
> ressurect this idea.
> 
> 

Something like following patch :

 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c |   51 +++++++++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
index a846d63..ed54f80 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
@@ -293,6 +293,8 @@ struct ipt_entry *ipt_next_entry(const struct ipt_entry *entry)
 	return (void *)entry + entry->next_offset;
 }
 
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(seqcount_t, counters_seq);
+
 /* Returns one of the generic firewall policies, like NF_ACCEPT. */
 unsigned int
 ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
@@ -311,6 +313,7 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	unsigned int *stackptr, origptr, cpu;
 	const struct xt_table_info *private;
 	struct xt_action_param acpar;
+	seqcount_t *seq;
 
 	/* Initialization */
 	ip = ip_hdr(skb);
@@ -364,7 +367,11 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 				goto no_match;
 		}
 
+		seq = &__get_cpu_var(counters_seq);
+		/* could be faster if we had this_cpu_write_seqcount_begin() */
+		write_seqcount_begin(seq);
 		ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, skb->len, 1);
+		write_seqcount_end(seq);
 
 		t = ipt_get_target(e);
 		IP_NF_ASSERT(t->u.kernel.target);
@@ -877,6 +884,7 @@ translate_table(struct net *net, struct xt_table_info *newinfo, void *entry0,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+
 static void
 get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
 	     struct xt_counters counters[])
@@ -884,42 +892,27 @@ get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
 	struct ipt_entry *iter;
 	unsigned int cpu;
 	unsigned int i;
-	unsigned int curcpu = get_cpu();
-
-	/* Instead of clearing (by a previous call to memset())
-	 * the counters and using adds, we set the counters
-	 * with data used by 'current' CPU.
-	 *
-	 * Bottom half has to be disabled to prevent deadlock
-	 * if new softirq were to run and call ipt_do_table
-	 */
-	local_bh_disable();
-	i = 0;
-	xt_entry_foreach(iter, t->entries[curcpu], t->size) {
-		SET_COUNTER(counters[i], iter->counters.bcnt,
-			    iter->counters.pcnt);
-		++i;
-	}
-	local_bh_enable();
-	/* Processing counters from other cpus, we can let bottom half enabled,
-	 * (preemption is disabled)
-	 */
+
+	memset(counters, 0, sizeof(struct xt_counters) * t->size);
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		if (cpu == curcpu)
-			continue;
+		seqcount_t *seq = &per_cpu(counters_seq, cpu);
+
 		i = 0;
-		local_bh_disable();
-		xt_info_wrlock(cpu);
 		xt_entry_foreach(iter, t->entries[cpu], t->size) {
-			ADD_COUNTER(counters[i], iter->counters.bcnt,
-				    iter->counters.pcnt);
+			u64 bcnt, pcnt;
+			unsigned int start;
+
+			do {
+				start = read_seqcount_begin(seq);
+				bcnt = iter->counters.bcnt;
+				pcnt = iter->counters.pcnt;
+			} while (read_seqcount_retry(seq, start));
+
+			ADD_COUNTER(counters[i], bcnt, pcnt);
 			++i; /* macro does multi eval of i */
 		}
-		xt_info_wrunlock(cpu);
-		local_bh_enable();
 	}
-	put_cpu();
 }
 
 static struct xt_counters *alloc_counters(const struct xt_table *table)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html