lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:04:05 +0100
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Cc:	Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>, davem@...emloft.net,
	gerg@...pgear.com, eric@...rea.com, bryan.wu@...onical.com,
	r64343@...escale.com, B32542@...escale.com, lw@...o-electronics.de,
	w.sang@...gutronix.de, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] net/fec: add mac field into platform data and
	consolidate fec_get_mac

Hello Shawn,

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:12:44AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 01:42:21PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 07:58:09PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:31:38AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 06:05:21PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:53:30AM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > > > 	if (iap == fec_mac_default)
> > > > > 		dev->dev_addr[ETH_ALEN-1] = fec_mac_default[ETH_ALEN-1] + fep->pdev->id;
> > > > Can this overflow?  (I didn't check the code, so my concern might be
> > > > completely stupid here.)
> > > No. dev->dev_addr points to netdev_hw_addr->addr, which is a 32 bytes array.
> > I didn't mean an out-of-bound access, but what is if
> > fec_mac_default[ETH_ALEN-1] is 0xff and you add 1?  Does that result in
> > 0x100 or 0?  What if id is <0?  For big ids you might even handle a
> > carry to indixes <ETH_ALEN-2.
> > 
> First of all, all my patch did is changing fep->index to,
> fep->pdev->id, which should not bring any problem you are concerned.
> 
> Secondly, I do not understand how the overflow on 
> fec_mac_default[ETH_ALEN-1] can result in a carry on the next array
> element. Here is what I'm seeing with fec_mac=00:04:9f:01:30:ff.
There is no automatic carry to the next array element.  I just wondered
how overflow should be handled ...
 
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:04:9F:01:30:FF
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:04:9F:01:30:00
If this is intended, it's totally OK for me.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ