netdev - Re: inbound connection problems when "netlink: test for all flags of the NLM_F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:39:42 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
Cc:	jarkao2@...il.com, pablo@...filter.org,
	arthur.marsh@...ernode.on.net, jengelh@...ozas.de,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: inbound connection problems when "netlink: test for all flags
 of the NLM_F_DUMP composite" commit applied

From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:05:03 -0500

> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 10:24 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> 
>> Do you all expect all users manage to upgrade avahi app before
>> changing their stable kernel? I mean "own distro" users especially.
> 
> Unfortunately if that app is widely deployed, it is not pragmatic
> to break it in the name of pedanticity. i.e.
> Be conservative in what you send (clearly Avahi is farting all over the
> place) but more importantly be a nice liberal in what you accept.
> Maybe tell them if you have the cycles about their bad behavior.
> The important part is the GET (kind = 2). The DUMP as Jarek says
> is merely a utility to extrapolate that we need you to
> get everything.. So it is not such a big deal if someone passes
> extraneous senseless flags. Wrong? yes.

Fair enough, I'll revert the netlink patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html