lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:11:16 +1100 From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> Cc: Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipvs: fix compiler warnings On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:34:23AM +0800, Changli Gao wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 06:02:13PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote: > >> Fix compiler warnings when no transport protocol load balancing support > >> is configured. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> > >> --- > >> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 4 +--- > >> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 4 ++++ > >> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c | 4 ++++ > >> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c > >> index f36a84f..d889f4f 100644 > >> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c > >> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c > >> @@ -1894,9 +1894,7 @@ static int __net_init __ip_vs_init(struct net *net) > >> > >> static void __net_exit __ip_vs_cleanup(struct net *net) > >> { > >> - struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = net_ipvs(net); > >> - > >> - IP_VS_DBG(10, "ipvs netns %d released\n", ipvs->gen); > >> + IP_VS_DBG(10, "ipvs netns %d released\n", net_ipvs(net)->gen); > >> } > >> > > > > The hunk above seems unrelated to the problem described. > > The rest of the changes look good. I will double check and > > apply them to my tree. > > > > Yes, is a separated patch needed? It is trivial. Thanks. Yes, please send a separate patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists