netdev - Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:00:31 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	horms@...ge.net.au
Cc:	randy.dunlap@...cle.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs)

From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:57:28 +1100

> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:18:47AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > 
>> > > Hi all,
>> > > 
>> > > Changes since 20110121:
>> > > 
>> > > The net tree lost its build failure.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled:
>> > 
>> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int'
>> > ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined!
>> > ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined!
>> 
>> Thanks, I'm looking into it.
> 
> On a related note, does IPVS need to handle the case
> where CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled?

Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html