netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: Increase the initial congestion window to 10.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:17:14 -0500
From:	John Heffner <johnwheffner@...il.com>
To:	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	dccp@...r.kernel.org, therbert@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Increase the initial congestion window to 10.

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:07:50 -0800 (PST), David Miller wrote:
>
>> +/* TCP initial congestion window */
>> +#define TCP_INIT_CWND                10
>> +
>
> Davem, there is _no_ research how this huge IW will behave in environments
> with a small BDP. Belief it or not, but there are networks out there with a
> BDP similar to ~1980. Why for heaven's sake should this work in these
> environments? There are only _two_ extensive analysis one from Cherry and
> and one from Ilpo. Both analysis focus on current mainstream BDP. I started
> to setup a ns-2 environment but due to lack of time I am a little bit
> behind schedule. Anyway, why not make this a tunable per route knob so that
> it is easier to fix things, e.g. set IW back to 3.


There's already a per-route tunable, right (RTAX_INITCWND)?

  -John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html