lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:18:36 +0530 From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> Cc: anthony@...emonkey.ws, arnd@...db.de, avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au Subject: Re: [v3 RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote on 02/23/2011 12:09:15 PM: Hi Michael, > > Yes. Michael Tsirkin had wanted to see how the MQ RX patch > > would look like, so I was in the process of getting the two > > working together. The patch is ready and is being tested. > > Should I send a RFC patch at this time? > > Yes, please do. Sure, will get a build/test on latest bits and send in 1-2 days. > > The TX-only patch helped the guest TX path but didn't help > > host->guest much (as tested using TCP_MAERTS from the guest). > > But with the TX+RX patch, both directions are getting > > improvements. > > Also, my hope is that with appropriate queue mapping, > we might be able to do away with heuristics to detect > single stream load that TX only code needs. Yes, that whole stuff is removed, and the TX/RX path is unchanged with this patch (thankfully :) > > Remote testing is still to be done. > > Others might be able to help here once you post the patch. That's great, will appreciate any help. Thanks, - KK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists