netdev - Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:31:24 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...radead.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rick.jones2@...com,
	therbert@...gle.com, wsommerfeld@...gle.com,
	daniel.baluta@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel?

Le mardi 01 mars 2011 à 21:18 +0800, Herbert Xu a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:03:29PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > I believe its now done properly (in net-next-2.6) with commit
> > 4f57c087de9b46182 (net: implement mechanism for HW based QOS)
> 
> Nope, that has nothing to do with this.

Right, I was thinking of commit 1d24eb4815d1e0e8 (xps: Transmit Packet
Steering)

Now you say all this stuff should be replaced by "use this cpu number
nly", just because you have a multi threaded process sending UDP frames
trough one socket...

This wont work for tcp streams, you could imagine a multi-threaded
application using a shared tcp socket as well. Too many OOO packets.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html