netdev - Re: bonding can't change to another slave if you ifdown the active slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:38:48 +0800
From:	Weiping Pan <panweiping3@...il.com>
To:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bonding can't change to another slave if you ifdown the active
 slave

On 03/08/2011 08:51 PM, WANG Cong wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:52:52 +0800, Weiping Pan wrote:
>
>> ok, I use "Host-only mode" and get
>>
>>
>>
>> an conclusion, that if the first enslaved nic is pulled out, bonding
>> can't handle well.
>>
>> First test.
>> I first enslave eth6, then pull it out, bonding doesn't work. on host,
> ...
>>
>> Second test
>> I first enslave eth6, then pull eth7 out, bonding works well. on guest,
> Can you show me your /proc/net/bonding/bond0 before and after pulling down
> eth6 or eth7? And what does `ip link show` say?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
And I test it again, there is no problem with kvm.
Maybe there is bug in virtualbox.

thanks
Weiping Pan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html