netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 1/9] at91: provide macb clks with "pclk" and "hclk" name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:00:10 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>
Cc:	nicolas.ferre@...el.com, Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
	plagnioj@...osoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/9] at91: provide macb clks with "pclk" and "hclk"
	name

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:22:37AM +0200, Andrew Victor wrote:
> hi Russell,
> 
> >> There is no reference to a "pclk" or "hclk" in the AT91 architecture.
> >> So to avoid possible confusion, maybe create two "fake" clocks both
> >> parented to "macb_clk", and add a comment they're only for
> >> compatibility with the AVR32.
> >
> > It doesn't matter what's in the documentation.
> >
> > What matters more than conforming to documentation is keeping the drivers
> > in a clean and maintainable state without throwing lots of ifdefs into
> > them.
> 
> I'm not saying the drivers need ifdefs, they should request both
> "pclk" and "hclk" as suggested.
> 
> What I was suggesting is the platform clock setup on AT91 as:
>     macb_clk
>         |
>         +-- hclk
>         +-- pclk
> 
> rather than:
>     pclk
>         |
>         +-- hclk

And what I've been saying all along is to make pclk a _dummy_ clock on
the platform it doesn't exist for, rather than making it related in some
way to another clock given to the peripheral.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html