lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:46:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Poll about irqsafe_cpu_add and others On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote: > When we know we run from BH context, we can use __this_cpu_inc(), but if > we dont know or run from user/process context, we would need irqsafe_inc > variant. If the BH context is the only one where we care about performance then its ok I would think. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists