netdev - Re: [PATCH 12/34] isdn/diva: Drop __TIME_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:07:05 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Armin Schindler <armin@...ware.de>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/34] isdn/diva: Drop __TIME__ usage

On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 17:10 +0200, Armin Schindler wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to
>>> repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each
>>> time.
>>
>> The module can be build separately from the kernel, therefore it can have
>> an own build timestamp.
> [...]
>
> If you want to distribute an out-of-tree version, that's your own
> business.  It shouldn't limit what is done with the in-tree version.
> Perhaps we could make modpost add a build timestamp to OOT modules,
> though.

I know out-of-tree stuff doesn't matter here. But I'm thinking
about just doing 'make modules'.

Armin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html