netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/27] HFI: Add HFI adapter control structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:21:11 -0400
From:	Jim Dykman <dykmanj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Piyush Chaudhary <piyushc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Fu-Chung Chang <fcchang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"William S. Cadden" <wscadden@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Wen C. Chen" <winstonc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Scot Sakolish <sakolish@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jian Xiao <jian@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Carol L. Soto" <clsoto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Sarah J. Sheppard" <sjsheppa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/27] HFI: Add HFI adapter control structure

On 3/2/2011 5:44 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 14:21 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Wed,  2 Mar 2011 16:09:48 -0500
>> dykmanj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/hfi/core/Makefile b/drivers/net/hfi/core/Makefile
>>> index 80790c6..6fe4e60 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/hfi/core/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/hfi/core/Makefile
>>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>>  #
>>>  # Makefile for the HFI device driver for IBM eServer System p
>>>  #
>>> -hfi_core-objs:=	hfidd_init.o
>>> +hfi_core-objs:=	hfidd_adpt.o \
>>> +		hfidd_init.o
>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_HFI) += hfi_core.o
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/hfi/core/hfidd_adpt.c b/drivers/net/hfi/core/hfidd_adpt.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..d64fa38
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/hfi/core/hfidd_adpt.c
> [...]
>>> +void hfidd_free_adapter(struct hfidd_acs *p_acs)
>>> +{
>>> +	kfree(p_acs);
>>> +	p_acs = NULL;
>>> +	return;
>>> +}
>>
>> If these were not in a separate file the could be marked as static.
> 
> I assume they're intending to add some more interesting code here in the
> next installment.
> 

Yes, there is more to come.

>> Doing a return; on last line of a void function is considered poor
>> style since it is unnecessary.
> 
> Assigning to a local variable just before returning is also silly.
> 
> Ben.
> 
Both removed in v2. 

Jim

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html