netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ipv4,ipv6,bonding: Restore control over number of peer notifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:21:17 -0400
From:	Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ipv4,ipv6,bonding: Restore control over
 number of peer notifications

On 04/26/2011 10:14 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 22:09 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
>> On 04/26/2011 09:25 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> For backward compatibility, we should retain the module parameters and
>>> sysfs attributes to control the number of peer notifications
>>> (gratuitous ARPs and unsolicited NAs) sent after bonding failover.
>>> Also, it is possible for failover to take place even though the new
>>> active slave does not have link up, and in that case the peer
>>> notification should be deferred until it does.
>>>
>>> Change ipv4 and ipv6 so they do not automatically send peer
>>> notifications on bonding failover.
>>>
>>> Change the bonding driver to send separate NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEERS
>>> notifications when the link is up, as many times as requested.  Since
>>> it does not directly control which protocols send notifications, make
>>> num_grat_arp and num_unsol_na aliases for a single parameter.  Bump
>>> the bonding version number and update its documentation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean by this.  You didn't write any of it and
> you're not a maintainer with your own repository.  Did you mean to say
> 'Reviewed-by' or 'Acked-by'?

Sorry, yes:

Acked-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html