netdev - Re: [PATCH] linux/stmmac.h: include <linux/platform_device.h> to remove compilation warning.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 May 2011 15:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	viresh.kumar@...com
Cc:	peppe.cavallaro@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	shiraz.hashim@...com, armando.visconti@...com, deepak.sikri@...com,
	viresh.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/stmmac.h: include <linux/platform_device.h> to
 remove compilation warning.

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 12:00:37 +0530

> stmmac.h uses struct platform_device and doesn't include
> <linux/platform_device.h>. And so we get following compilation warning while
> using this file:
> 	warning: ‘struct platform_device’ declared inside parameter list
> 
> This patch includes <linux/platform_device.h> in stmmac.h to remove this warning
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>

This patch applies to neither net-2.6, nor net-next-2.6

The context around your change in all current trees looks a lot
different than what's in your patch.

In fact, even if I go through the entire history in GIT of this
header file, those STMAC_TYPE_0 defines are never there.

The string "STMAC_TYPE_0" doesn't even show up in a query to google
code search.

What tree are you even patching against?