netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/4] tulip: xircom_cb: Remove useless func_enter and func

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 May 2011 12:17:03 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/4] tulip: xircom_cb: Remove useless
 func_enter and func_exit

On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 12:10 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 12:08:01 -0700
> > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 11:47 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> With the advent of the function tracer, those silly function entry/exit
> >> logging things are entirely superfluous.
> >> They make the code look ugly too.
> > I don't much like a lot of debugging messages
> > throughout drivers/net, but that's a whole 'nother
> > set of patches.
> >> Please do that and respin this patch set, thanks Joe!
> > How 'bout I just add another patch to delete them.
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> How about you just respin the patch set as I asked you to?
> It makes no sense to "fix" something you're just going to
> delete in the very next commit.

Grumble.
'Cause it's about 20 minutes work for almost _no_ value.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html