netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/10] ipvs: Use IP_VS_RT_MODE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 May 2011 02:32:09 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] ipvs: Use IP_VS_RT_MODE_* instead of magic
 constants.


	Hello,

On Tue, 10 May 2011, David Miller wrote:

> > 	Following patch can be used after patch 4, eg. as
> > number 6 because patches 4 and 5 are ok and we are going to replace
> > patches 6 and 7.
> 
> Thanks Julian.
> 
> What I'm going to do is hold back the IPVS parts of the patches I
> posted last night.  In particular, I'll integrate this into the
> original patch #4.
> 
> And then we can work through the reimplementation ideas you posted to
> me in private email.

	My simple tests do not show any problems with patches
4, 5 and the new 6 and 7. I tested TUN mode for rt_src/rt_dst
and DR/NAT for rt_dst replacement, related ICMP is relayed properly.
So, we should be ok but I'll do more tests in the following
days because the list with possible combinations for testing
is too long: different forwarding mode (DR/TUN/NAT),
local or remote real server, local or remote client,
In or Out related ICMP, Passive or Active FTP...

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html