netdev - Re: [PATCH 15/15] ehea: Remove unused tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 May 2011 20:12:07 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	anton@...ba.org, leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, michael@...erman.id.au,
	jesse@...nel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] ehea: Remove unused tcp_end field in send WQ

On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 23:06 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:31:13 -0700
> > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 10:52 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> >> plain text document attachment (ehea_22.patch)
> >> The tcp_end field is not actually used by the hardware, so there
> >> is no need to set it. 
> >> +++ linux-net/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_qmr.h	2011-05-12 07:48:06.380382084 +1000
> >> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ struct ehea_swqe {
> >>  	u8 immediate_data_length;
> >>  	u8 tcp_offset;
> >>  	u8 reserved2;
> >> -	u16 tcp_end;
> >> +	u16 reserved2b;
> >>  	u8 wrap_tag;
> >>  	u8 descriptors;		/* number of valid descriptors in WQE */
> >>  	u16 reserved3;
> > struct ehea_swqe isn't __packed.  Shouldn't it be?
> Please don't mark it __packed unless absolutely necessary :-)

Isn't it read from hardware.
If not, why reserve anything?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html