netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] vlan: Do not support clearing VLAN_FLAG_REORDER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 May 2011 10:14:02 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
	Nicolas de Pesloüan 
	<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] vlan: Do not support clearing VLAN_FLAG_REORDER_HDR

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>> In another side, is there a specification which defines the
>> hw-accel-vlan-rx?
>
> I don't know.
>
> I have just been trying to clean up the mess since some of the
> hw-accel-vlan code broke my use case, by delivering packets with
> priority but no vlan (aka vlan 0 packets) twice to my pf_packet sockets.
>

OK. But if we have decided to simulate the hw-accel-vlan-rx, I think
we'd better adjust the place where we put the emulation code. The very
beginnings of netif_rx() and neif_receive_skb() are better. Then rps
can support vlan packets without any change.

-- 
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html