lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:38:27 +0200 From: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> To: Armin Schindler <armin@...ware.de> Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/34] isdn/diva: Drop __TIME__ usage Dne 5.4.2011 17:10, Armin Schindler napsal(a): > On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michal Marek wrote: >> The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to >> repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each >> time. > > The module can be build separately from the kernel, therefore it can have > an own build timestamp. So the module timestamp and kernel timestamp vary by a couple of minutes. But is it really a problem? I don't think so. So is there an objection against applying this patch? thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists