netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/24] bnx2x: New FW and support for 578xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:54:02 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vladz@...adcom.com
Cc:	mchan@...adcom.com, bprakash@...adcom.com, eilong@...adcom.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, dmitry@...adcom.com,
	yaniv.rosner@...adcom.com, dwmw2@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/24] bnx2x: New FW and support for 578xx

From: "Vlad Zolotarov" <vladz@...adcom.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:32:31 +0300

> We also send the new FW files to David Woodhouse. It's the first time we
> submit to the linux-firmware git so I hope we don't mess the things up: we
> DO NOT patch firmware/WHENCE and firmware/Makefile files in our net-next
> patches and we patch the WHENCE file in the linux-firmware patch. Dave,
> pls., confirm if it's a correct procedure.
> 
> If it is, pls., note that the bnx2x driver will compile but won't work
> until u integrate the new FW into the kernel tree.

David Woodhouse, what do you think we should do here?

I'm inclined to integrate the firmware into net-next-2.6 since this
is the only way to keep the driver working consistently.

Otherwise people won't be able to git bisect properly, and that sucks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html