[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:40:31 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"greearb@...delatech.com" <greearb@...delatech.com>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/2] e1000e: use GFP_KERNEL allocations at
init time
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 19:33 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:51:23 -0700
>
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 14:53, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> >> Note : This patch is untested, I dont have the hardware
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/2] e1000e: use GFP_KERNEL allocations at init time
> >>
> >> In process and sleep allowed context, favor GFP_KERNEL allocations over
> >> GFP_ATOMIC ones.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> >> CC: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
> >> CC: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h | 2 +-
> >> drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> >> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > Thanks Eric! I have added the patch to my queue.
>
> You can't until I put patch #1 into my tree, which adds the
> new interfaces used by this patch.
I applied patch #1 to my queue as well (for testing purposes) since I
saw that patch #2 was dependent. If it passes testing, I (or Bruce)
will just ACK patch #2, that way you can apply both patches at the same
time.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists