| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:43:47 +0200 From: Nicolas de Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com> To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: bonding and ifenslave version. Le 02/08/2011 22:06, Nicolas de Pesloüan a écrit : > Commit 655f8919d549ad1872e24d826b6ce42530516d2e > bonding: add min links parameter to 802.3ad > > and commit ebd8e4977a87cb81d93c62a9bff0102a9713722f > bonding: add all_slaves_active parameter > > introduced new options to bonding, but didn't provide the documentation > for those options. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas de Pesloüan<nicolas.2p.debian@...e.fr> > --- Jay, Andy, While working at this patch, I noticed that the bonding driver version wasn't bumped up at the time those options were introduced. I thought introducing a new option should cause the driver version to change. Am I right? On a different but related topic, the version in Documentation/networking/ifenslave.c (1.1.0) didn't change since the git origin and probably since 2003. Arguably, none of the commit regarding this file introduced a significant change (with the possible exception of commit e6d184e33109010412ad1d59719af74755a935f4, [NET]: Fix ifenslave to not fail on lack of IP information). But if we never change a 3-level version number, whatever the level of change, this version number might be useless. Any comment? Nicolas. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists