netdev - Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:37:37 +0200
From:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
CC:	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

On 08/08/2011 06:08 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 06:03:06PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
...
> So we would stay with the clk_* functions.  I assume clk_get() would
> return NULL, clk_get_rate() would just return fsl_get_sys_freq() and
> the other functions would do nothing.  Doesn't this really polute what
> clk_* functions are supposed to do?  Aren't we making flexcan dictate
> a different behavior for powerpc than for the arm (and possibly other)
> architectures?

Well, I see it as one way to provide compatibility with the ARM port. If
the PowerPC people don't like it, we can switch to something else,
whatever they suggest.

Wolfgang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html