netdev - Re: Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:54:02 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW_EMAC)

[just cc'ing linuxppc-dev mailing list]

On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:07:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> In commit 9aa328359545 ("ehea/ibm*: Move the IBM drivers") from Dave's
> net tree, you not only move the drivers around, but you change
> CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to CONFIG_IBM_EMAC.  Won't that mean that all the
> PowerPC configs that currently set CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to y will no
> longer build this driver?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped