netdev - Re: [Bug 42012] New: regression on 2.6.39.3 with socket/bind; still there in 3.0.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:00:52 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 42012] New: regression on 2.6.39.3 with socket/bind;
 still there in 3.0.4

Le mardi 30 août 2011 à 15:52 -0400, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:44:19 +0200
> 
> > Status on FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE
> > 
> > bind(AF_UNSPEC) is accepted (converted to AF_INET), only with a 0.0.0.0
> > address.
> > 
> > Following code works :
> > 
> > struct sockaddr_in addr;
> > fd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> > memset(&addr, 0, sizeof(addr))
> > bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr)); -> 0
> > 
> > If tried on ipv6 sockets, it doesnt work : bind() returns -1, errno=47
> 
> Ok if we could add that 0.0.0.0 check too that would make me feel
> better about this change.

Sure, I will send a patch in a couple of minutes.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html