netdev - Re: [net-next] iproute2: Add new command to IP link to enable/disable VF spoof check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:19:59 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	benve@...co.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
	gregory.v.rose@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next] iproute2: Add new command to IP link to
 enable/disable VF spoof check

On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:00:49 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: "Christian Benvenuti (benve)" <benve@...co.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:54:53 -0500
> 
> > Does it mean that a Netlink interface becomes official (and backward
> > compatibility should not be broken) only once iproute2 starts
> > supporting it?
> 
> It needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.  Sometimes we can quickly
> fix a poorly designed netlink interface is no major tool takes on use of
> the feature.

If an interface changes before an official release, there is no
problem. I.e. if an interface goes through multiple versions while
in net-next (or a bug fix during 3.X-rc*) that's fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html