lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:04:40 +0200
From:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org, nautsch@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net/stable] can bcm: fix tx_setup off-by-one errors

On 09/29/11 09:58, David Miller wrote:

> From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:46:46 +0200
> 
>> when backporting the patch to an older kernel we discovered a problem this
>> patch is introducing - which causes a new regression :-(
>>
>> Could you please revert this patch and dequeue it from stable?
> 
> It's already pushed out to the net GIT tree, I can't delete history so
> now the only thing I can do is add a butt-ugly revert commit this late
> in the -rcX which is terrible.
> 
> This patch was sitting out there for review for 6 days, which should
> have been more than enough time to audit it for problems.


Yeah, i'm really sorry about that.

As Linus didn't pull the latest changes, what would be your favorite then to
not revert the patch?

Sending a new fix that fixes the broken fix?

Regards,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ