netdev - Re: [PATCH] route:ip_rt_frag_needed always return unzero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:33:00 +0800
From:	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] route:ip_rt_frag_needed always return unzero

于 2011年10月19日 09:34, Gao feng 写道:
> 2011.10.18 17:23, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Le mardi 18 octobre 2011 à 15:04 +0800, Gao feng a écrit :
>>> int function ip_rt_frag_need,if peer is null,
>>> there is no need to do ipprot->err_handler.
>>> I am right?
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>>  net/ipv4/route.c |    2 +-
>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
>>> index 075212e..6cde0fa 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
>>> @@ -1574,7 +1574,7 @@ unsigned short ip_rt_frag_needed(struct net *net, const struct iphdr *iph,
>>>  
>>>  		atomic_inc(&__rt_peer_genid);
>>>  	}
>>> -	return est_mtu ? : new_mtu;
>>> +	return est_mtu;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static void check_peer_pmtu(struct dst_entry *dst, struct inet_peer *peer)
>>
>> No idea why you want this, your changelog is a bit cryptic :)
>>
>> Wont this bypass the raw_icmp_error(skb, protocol, info);
>> call in icmp_unreach() as well ?
>>
>>
> 
> thanks Eric!
> 
> I mean that the pmtu is update by inet_peer->pmtu_learned as I know.
> so in function ip_rt_frag_needed,
> if inet_peer is null or someting else make the setting of inet_peer->pmtu_learned failed.
> there is no need to call function tcp_v4_err.
> 
> the call stack is
> icmp_unreach
>   |
>   |--->ip_rt_frag_needed(fill inet_peer)
>   |
>   |--->raw_icmp_error()
>   |
>   |--->ipprot->err_handler(tcp_v4_err or something else)
> 	|
> 	|--->tcp_v4_err(frag need icmp is triggered by tcp packet)
> 		|
> 		|--->do_pmtu_discovery
> 		(in this function both __sk_dst_check or dst->ops->update_pmtu
> 		need struct inet_peer to update pmtu)
> 
> so,I think when set inet_peer->pmtu_learned failed,
> in func icmp_unreach we should goto out immediately.
> 
> And it's confuse me that why func ping_err and udp_err not update the pmtu?
> What I miss?
> --

And move atomic_inc(&__rt_peer_genid) just like func ip_rt_update_pmtu?

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 6cde0fa..3e1aa5c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -1568,11 +1568,12 @@ unsigned short ip_rt_frag_needed(struct net *net, const
                        est_mtu = mtu;
                        peer->pmtu_learned = mtu;
                        peer->pmtu_expires = pmtu_expires;
+
+                       atomic_inc(&__rt_peer_genid);
                }

                inet_putpeer(peer);

-               atomic_inc(&__rt_peer_genid);
        }
        return est_mtu;
 }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html