lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:18:35 +0300 From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add TCP_NO_DELAYED_ACK socket option On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote: > Le jeudi 27 octobre 2011 à 14:54 +0300, Daniel Baluta a écrit : > >> Few days ago, in our custom kernel we made TCP Delack segments and >> TCP Delack timeout parameters tunable via proc entries. >> Increasing tcp_delack_segs (number of full sized segments that must >> be received until an ACK is sent) we observed an improvement of >> throughput up to 20% in some test cases. >> >> Do you think that this kind of patch would have a chance to be >> included in mainstream? >> > > If your patches are ready, why not sending them as RFC ? OK, I will port them to the latest kernel and send a patch. thanks, Daniel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists