netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/smsc911x: Always wait for the chip to be ready

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:34:01 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...c.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Mathieu Poirer <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	Robert Marklund <robert.marklund@...ricsson.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/smsc911x: Always wait for the chip to be ready

2011/10/26 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>:

> From: Robert Marklund <robert.marklund@...ricsson.com>
>
> Wait for the chip to be ready before any access to it. On the
> Snowball platform we need to enable an external regulator before
> the chip comes online, and then it happens that the device is
> not yet ready at probe time, so let's wait for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Marklund <robert.marklund@...ricsson.com>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Since there doesn't seem to be any consternation concerning
this first patch, can it be applied?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html