netdev - Re: patch "workflow" - what deferred state means?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:57:13 +0200
From:	Maz The Northener <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@....com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: patch "workflow" - what deferred state means?

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:19 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Maz The Northener <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:08:00 +0200
>
>> I was talking about http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/123407/ and
>> patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/123406/
>
> This kind of work should be resubmitted when net-next opens back up.
>

I assume now would be correct time, right? If I am correct, net-next
is open now due to linux 3.2-rc1 (If I am wrong, please tell me how I
know when net-next is opened).
So I should resubmit the patches. I just fetched snapshot from
net-next.git at kernel.org, and tried applying the patches. Applying
succeeded but with offset. So should I redo patches on top of some
other kernel, and if so, which one?

-Matti
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html