[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:49:50 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
amit.kucheria@...onical.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
ben-linux@...ff.org, cjb@...top.org, alan@...ux.intel.com,
eric.miao@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 01/14] clk: add helper functions clk_prepare_enable
and clk_disable_unprepare
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:10:16AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>
> ---
> include/linux/clk.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk.h b/include/linux/clk.h
> index 7213b52..63985f7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk.h
> @@ -107,6 +107,25 @@ static inline void clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static inline int clk_prepare_enable(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare(clk);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = clk_enable(clk);
> + if (ret)
> + clk_unprepare(clk);
As Baruch already pointed out this is hard to read. Also it contains a
bug. When clk_prepare fails clk_unprepare is called afterwards.
Hint: Kernel guys are not afraid of having multiple return statements
in a function, instead they like it when something is handled early
without having to read the rest of the function.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists