lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:48:33 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	"Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:3357, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413

Le lundi 21 novembre 2011 à 21:18 -0600, Christoph Lameter a écrit :

> Hmmm... That means that c->page points to page not frozen. Per cpu
> partial pages are frozen until they are reused or until the partial list
> is flushed.
> 
> Does this ever happen on x86 or only on other platforms? In put_cpu_partial() the
> this_cpu_cmpxchg really needs really to be irq safe. this_cpu_cmpxchg is
> only preempt safe.
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c	2011-11-21 21:15:41.575673204 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c	2011-11-21 21:16:33.442336849 -0600
> @@ -1969,7 +1969,7 @@
>  		page->pobjects = pobjects;
>  		page->next = oldpage;
> 
> -	} while (this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page) != oldpage);
> +	} while (irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page) != oldpage);
>  	stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_FREE);
>  	return pobjects;
>  }
> 

For x86, I wonder if our !X86_FEATURE_CX16 support is correct on SMP
machines.

this_cpu_cmpxchg16b_emu() claims to be IRQ safe, but may be buggy...

Could we have somewhere a NMI handler calling kmalloc() ?

Please Markus send us :

cat /proc/cpuinfo



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ